Panorama do design for environment: uma revisão bibliográfica sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v18i1.2784Palavras-chave:
Gestão ambiental. RBS. DfE. Ciclo de desenvolvimento do produto. Práticas DfE.Resumo
Esta pesquisa é um estudo exploratório apresentando o Design for Environment - DfE como uma prática de gestão ambiental em Ecologia Industrial no ciclo de desenvolvimento do produto. O DfE analisa todas as etapas do ciclo de vida de um produto: desenvolvimento, fabricação, uso e disposição final propondo alterações no projeto, de forma a minimizar o impacto ambiental do produto. Com o intuito de analisar a literatura sobre o tema, esta pesquisa conduz uma Revisão Bibliográfica Sistemática - RBS sobre o DfE e práticas relacionadas. A RBS contempla uma etapa de planejamento, onde são definidos os objetivos da pesquisa, conceitos para inclusão e exclusão dos trabalhos a serem analisados, os trabalhos primários identificados e os materiais e métodos. A etapa seguinte é denominada processamento, que resulta mapeamento dos trabalhos. Nesta etapa, a análise dos objetivos dos artigos permitiu observar a convergência para temas relacionados à qualidade, inovação, estratégia, melhoria ambiental, avaliação ambiental, ferramenta, integração, setor ou produto específico estudado. A terceira etapa resultados, classifica os artigos por autoria e foco de pesquisa. Por fim esses artigos foram analisados e um conjunto de práticas relacionadas ao DfE disponíveis na literatura, foram classificadas de acordo com as etapas do ciclo de desenvolvimento do produto.
Downloads
Referências
ALVES, C. et al. Ecodesign of automotive components making use of natural jute fiber composites. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 18, n. 4, p. 313–327, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.022
ANDRIANKAJA, H. et al. A method to ecodesign structural parts in the transport sector based on product life cycle management. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 94, p. 165–176, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.026
ARANA-LANDIN, G.; HERAS-SAIZARBITORIA, I. Paving the way for the ISO 14006 ecodesign standard: An exploratory study in Spanish companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 19, n. 9-10, p. 1007–1015, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.01.013
ARDENTE, F.; MATHIEUX, F.; RECCHIONI, M. Recycling of electronic displays: Analysis of pre-processing and potential ecodesign improvements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 92, p. 158–171, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.09.005
BAUMANN, H.; BOONS, F.; BRAGD, A. Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 10, p. 409-425, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00015-X
BIOLCHINI, J. et al. Systematic review in software engineering. Technical Report. Systems Engineering and Computer Science Department. COPPEUFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, 2005.
BIRCH, A.; HON, K. K. B.; SHORT, T. Structure and output mechanisms in Design for Environment (DfE) tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 35, p. 50–58, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.029
BOKS, C. The soft side of ecodesign. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 14, n. 15-16, p. 1346–1356, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.015
BOKS, C.; STEVELS, A. Essential perspectives for design for environment. Experiences from the electronics industry. International Journal of Production Research, v. 45, n. 18, p. 4021–4039, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207540701439909
BONILLA, S. H. et al. Emergy as a tool for Ecodesign: evaluating materials selection for beverage packages in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 18, n. 1, p. 32–43, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.03.019
BONVOISIN, J. et al. An integrated method for environmental assessment and ecodesign of ICT-based optimization services. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 68, p. 144–154, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.003
BORCHARDT, M. et al. Considerações sobre ecodesign: um estudo de caso na indústria eletrônica automotiva. Ambiente & sociedade, v. 11, n. 2, p. 341–353, 2008.
BORCHARDT, M. et al. Reprojeto do contraforte: um caso de aplicação do ecodesign em manufatura calçadista. Produção, v. 20, n. 3, p. 392–403, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132010005000006
BORCHARDT, M. et al. Avaliação da presença de práticas do Design for Environment (DfE) no desenvolvimento de produto de uma empresa da indústria química. Produção, v. 22, n. 1, p. 58-69, jan/fev. 2012. doi: 10.1590/S0103-65132012005000001
BOVEA, M. D.; PÉREZ-BELIS, V. A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 20, n. 1, p. 61–71, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012
BRONES, F.; DE CARVALHO, M. From 50 to 1: Integrating literature toward a systemic ecodesign model. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 96, p. 44–47, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.036
BRONES, F.; DE CARVALHO, M. M.; ZANCUL, E. Ecodesign in project management: A missing link for the integration of sustainability in product development? Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 80, p. 106–118, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.088
BYGGETH, S.; HOCHSCHORNER, E. Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 14, n. 15-16, p. 1420–1430, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.024
CHARTER M.; TISCHNER U. Sustainable solutions. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing, 2001.
CHIANG, T. A.; ROY, R. An intelligent benchmark-based design for environment system for derivative eletronic product development. Computers in Industry, v. 63, p. 913-929, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.08.014
CONFORTO, E. C.; AMARAL, D. C.; SILVA, S. L. DA. Roteiro para revisão bibliográfica sistemática: aplicação no desenvolvimento de produtos e gerenciamento de projetos. 8° Congresso Brasileiro de Gestão de Desenvolvimento de Produto - CNGDP 2011, n. 1998, p. 1–12, 2011.
COOK, D. J.; MULROW, C. D.; HAYNES, R. B. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, v.126, n.5, p. 376-380, 1997. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006
COOPER, H. Synthesizing Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.
DANGELICO, R. M.; PONTRANDOLFO, P. From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 18, n. 16-17, p. 1608-1628, nov. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.07.007
FIKSEL, J. Ingeniería de diseño medioambiental. DEF: desarrollo integral de productos y processos ecoeficientes. Madrid: McGrawHill Book, 1997.
FIKSEL, J. Design for Environment: A Guide to Sustainable Product Development. 2.ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2009.
GIANNETTI, B. F.; ALMEIDA, C. M. V. B. Ecologia industrial: conceitos, ferramentas e aplicações. São Paulo: Blucher, 2006.
GONZÁLEZ-GARCÍA, S. et al. Assessing the global warming potential of wooden products from the furniture sector to improve their ecodesign. Science of the Total Environment, v. 410-411, p. 16–25, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.059
GOUDA, S. K.; JONNALAGEDDA, S.; SARANGA, H. Design for the environment: Impact of regulatory policies on product development. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 248, n. 2, p. 558–570, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.043
HERNANDEZ, N. V. et al. Development of an expert system to aid engineers in the selection of design for environment methods and tools. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 39, n. 10, p. 9543–9553, ago. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.098
HOUE, R.; GRABOT, B. Assessing the compliance of a product with an eco- label: from standards to constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 121, p. 21–38, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.03.014
JESWIET, J.; HAUSCHILD, M. EcoDesign and future environmental impacts. Materials & Design, v. 26, n. 7, p. 629-634, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.08.016
KENGPOL, A.; BOONKANIT, P. The decision support framework for developing Ecodesign at conceptual phase based upon ISO/TR 14062. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 131, n. 1, p. 4–14, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.006
KURK, F.; EAGAN, P. The value of adding design-for-the-environment to pollution prevention assistance options. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 16, n. 6, p. 722–726, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.022
LEWIS, H. et al. Design+environment: a global guide to designing greener goods. sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing Limited, 2001.
LINDAHL, M. Engineering designers’ experience of design for environment methods and tools e Requirement definitions from an interview study. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 14, n. 5, p. 487-496, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.02.003
LOFTHOUSE, V. A. Ecodesign tools for designers: defining the requirements. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 14, n. 15-16, p. 1386-1395, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.013
LUTTROPP, C.; LAGERSTEDT, J. EcoDesign and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 14, n. 15-16, p. 1396-1408, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022
MATOS, S.; HALL, J. Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: the case of sustainable development in the oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Operations Managment, v. 25, n. 6, p. 1083-1102, nov. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.013
MIETTINEM, P.; HAMALAINEN, R. P. How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). European Journal of of Operational Research, v. 102, n. 2, p. 279-294, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00109-4
MONTABON, F.; SROUFE, R.; NARASIMHAN, R. An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, v. 25, n. 5, p. 998-1014, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.10.003
PARK, P. J.; TAHARA, K. Quantifying producer and consumer-based eco-efficiencies for the identification of key ecodesign issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 16, n. 1, p. 95-104, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.11.003
PASSARINI, F. et al. Assessment of Ecodesign potential in reaching new recycling targets. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 54, n. 12, p. 1128–1134, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.006
PIGOSSO, D. C. A. et al. Ecodesign methods focused on remanufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 18, n. 1, p. 21–31, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.005
PIGOSSO, D. C. A.; ROZENFELD, H.; MCALOONE, T. C. Ecodesign maturity model: A management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 59, p. 160–173, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040
PLATCHECK, E. R. et al. Methodology of ecodesign for the development of more sustainable electro-electronic equipments. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 16, n. 1, p. 75–86, 2008a. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.10.006
PLATCHECK, E. R. et al. EcoDesign: case of a mini compressor re-design. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 16, n. 14, p. 1526–1535, 2008b. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.09.004
PLOUFFE, S. et al. Economic benefits tied to ecodesign. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 19, n. 6-7, p. 573–579, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.003
POCHAT, S.; BERTOLUCI, G.; FROELICH, D. Integrating ecodesign by conducting changes in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 15, n. 7, p. 671–680, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.004
RAZ, G.; DRUEHL, C. T.; BLASS, V. Design for the Environment: Life-Cycle Approach Using a Newsvendor Model. Production and operations management, v. 22, n. 4, p. 940–957, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12011
ROCA, E. et al. Application of fuzzy logic for the integration of environmental criteria in ecodesign. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 39, n. 4, p. 4427–4431, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.148
SAKUNDARINI, N. et al. Design for environment and design for disassembly practices in Malaysia: A practitioner’s perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 108, p. 331–342, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.033
SHORT, T. et al. Manufacturing, sustainability, ecodesign and risk: lessons learned from a study of Swedish and English companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 37, p. 342-352, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.037
SILVA, A. L. E.; MORAES, J. A. R.; MACHADO, E. L. Proposta de produção mais limpa voltada às práticas de ecodesign e logística reversa. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, v. 20, n. 1, p. 29-37, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-41522015020000087843
SROUFE, R. Effect of environmental management systems on environmental management practices and operations. Production and Operations Management Journal, v. 12, n. 3, p. 416-431, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2003.tb00212.x
TIRUTA-BARNA, L. et al. Formalization of a technical procedure for process ecodesign dedicated to drinking water treatment plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 68, p. 16-24, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.011
VAN HEMEL, C.; CRAMER, J. Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 10, p. 439-453, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00013-6
WIMMER, W. et al. Product innovation through ecodesign. International Journal of Sustainable Design, v. 1, p. 75-92, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSDES.2008.017058
ZHANG, L. et al. Development and analysis of design for environment oriented design parameters. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 19, n. 15, p. 1723-1733, out. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.012
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
A Revista se reserva no direito de efetuar, no artigo publicado, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores.
A obra publicada é de inteira responsabilidade do(s) autor(es), cabendo à Revista Produção Online apenas a avaliação da obra, na qualidade de veículo de publicação científica. A Revista Produção Online não se responsabiliza por eventuais violações à Lei nº 9.610/1998, Lei de Direito Autoral.
A revista Produção Online permite que o autor detenha o copyright dos artigos aceitos para publicação, sem restrições.
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons.
